Showing posts with label Queen's speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Queen's speech. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 May 2013

TORY DISARRAY PLAYS INTO HANDS OF FARAGE AND Ukip.


Following on from the scare delivered by Ukip in the recent council elections, the Conservative party is now running around like the proverbial headless chicken.
 
While Nigel Farage can't stop smiling, David Cameroon and his pals are in an almighty funk, simply not knowing how to respond to the Ukip challenge. Indeed, they seem to believe that 'more of the same' is all that's needed and various senior party figures have trotted out to give us all the usual hogwash - Theresa May failed dismally on radio 4 a few days ago and Grant Shapps fails miserably every time he appears. How this man was ever considered to be the best choice for Party Chairman has to be one of the mysteries of the age. The only one I've seen so far who makes any sense and talks coherently is Michael Gove, someone to whom I do not particularly warm. On today's 'Andrew Marr Show', he gave straightforward answers to straightforward questions and came across very well; for the first time, I saw him as a possible future leader of the Conservative party, perhaps sooner rather than later. 
 
Of course, with all this Tory mayhem, Labour has plenty to get its teeth into, except that it, too, is failing to make any headway. They continue to trot out the same tired old socialist claptrap and continue to try to pick holes in Government policies while offering no real policies or alternatives themselves. Interestingly, when I write that they are attacking Government policies, I really mean Conservative ones, as attacks on the Liberal Democrat part of the coalition are few and far between, presumably due to considerations about future coalition possibilities as well as the increasing irrelevance of that party.
 
Next week, a group of Conservative MPs will try to obtain a debate on the 'Queen's Speech' that will centre on the issue of our membership of the European Union; the intention will be to take the debate to a vote which will, effectively, be a vote about the continuation of that membership. It's a measure of the disarray in which the party now finds itself that all Tory ministers are being 'advised' to abstain from voting even though it is party policy to hold a referendum on our continuing membership sometime after the next general election; backbench MPs will be allowed a free vote. The expectation is that at least 100 Tory MPs will vote for a motion which effectively calls into question our continued membership, arguing for a referendum before the end of this Parliament. While the Liberals will vote, en masse, against any such measure, the Labour party may find itself divided though most will probably discard any personal views and vote whichever way their whips tell them to.
 
Whatever happens, the Tories will be shown as being irrevocably split over the issue of Europe. Historically, such a split has been catastrophic news for the party and there's no reason to believe it won't be again. I can see Nigel Farage grinning from ear to ear and, unlike the 'Cheshire Cat', he shows no signs of fading away. 

Thursday, 9 May 2013

QUEEN GETS TOUGH ON IMMIGRANTS !

The 'Queen's Speech', unlike the 'King's Speech', was an event of great theatricality but with no real purpose or result. While King George VI struggled manfully to get his own words out, Queen Elizabeth had little difficulty in mouthing the usual rubbish provided for her by successive governments over a period of 60 years.
 
One has to wonder what Her Majesty thinks of the drivel and endless platitudes that her Prime Ministers force her to read out and put her name to. As a rule, much of it announces measures to curb our freedoms still further, much is about 'saving us from ourselves' and the rest is about purely political issues designed to help whoever is in power today to win the next election.
 
This year's speech was little different but did include a novel idea - individuals in the community such as landlords and GPs will now be required to carry out the role of 'immigration police', checking the origins of everyone with whom they come into contact and reporting those they believe to be illegal immigrants to the authorities. How this will work, if it can be made to do so, hasn't been explained.
 
For decades, the NHS has been expected to identify those who are not eligible for free care and to charge them accordingly. Hospitals have established vast and complicated procedures that have, by and large, been a pointless waste of money. Even if chargeable individuals have been identified and billed, they usually disappear without trace after being discharged; little money is ever forthcoming. Inexplicably, this government seems to be oblivious to this and has said that they will introduce new measures to ensure that short-term migrants will pay for their NHS care; furthermore, landlords will have to check the 'immigration status' of potential tenants though, again, how they will do this hasn't been set out. Most astonishing of all, illegal immigrants will not be allowed to have driving licences; pardon me, but are they saying that such people are allowed to hold driving licences at the moment ? Surely one fundamental feature of being an 'illegal immigrant' must be that the state does not know who they are; are they not outside of the 'system' and, hence, automatically denied such things ?
 
In truth, none of this will work and it's clear that all the rhetoric about being tough on immigration and illegal immigrants is no more than an attempt to con people into voting Conservative at the next general election. Neither this government nor any other likely one has any intention of doing anything that will really deal with the issues that face our country. Vastly excessive immigration and the creation of largely separate 'immigrant communities' is but one, though a major one, of these issues, but there is no chance whatsoever of our leaders dealing with it; it's all far too political and difficult and they have their futures as overpaid international ambassadors and statesmen to think about.
 
If I believed in a God, I'd be saying 'God, help us !', but I don't and I'm afraid we're on our own.